If I recall correctly, the thing went back and forth. If you hit the pasteboard cutout, it reversed direction ... maybe.
Thursday, December 17, 2020
Stupendous Mega-Post: Merry Christmas from 1960!
If I recall correctly, the thing went back and forth. If you hit the pasteboard cutout, it reversed direction ... maybe.
Monday, December 14, 2020
From 1982 - In Search of the Perfect Version of Your Favorite Movie
Thursday, December 10, 2020
The Rest of the VOYAGE Is Available on Amazon!
Volume 1 briefly covered Irwin Allen’s early career, leading into the development and production of Voyage. Season One of the series is covered in depth.
Volume 2 completes the tale, beginning with Season Two through the end of the voyage. You’ll learn each episode’s story and script development, casting, (sometimes cheesy) special effects, broadcast, and you’ll read contemporary views on the series and its cast and crew.
Just as Volume 1 contained a bonus chapter on “The Composers of Voyage,” Volume 2 wraps up with “Voyage to the Toy Store,” a survey of show-related tie-ins from toys and lunchboxes to books and trading cards. Also featured is Gold Key’s 16-issue comic-book series, with synopses and covers.
Monday, December 07, 2020
A Dusty Christmas Present
Thursday, December 03, 2020
December's Calendar Pages
Monday, November 30, 2020
Lost in the Mists of Time and Space
Thursday, November 26, 2020
A Chip off the Old Book
More than that, beginning in junior high I kept a log of every book I read. If it’s a book I owned, my practice has been to write the date(s) of reading on some bookmark, which stayed with the book.
For example (above), I’ve read The Hobbit twelve times, finishing on the dates seen above. The first four times was a copy which was part of the Ballantine paperbacks set.
This set I lent to a friend who never returned it. No, I’m not mad at him!
In contrast, I’ve read Ray Bradbury’s Something Wicked This Way Comes a whopping 28 times.
The above image typifies my habit of using a book’s receipt as its bookmark.
https://markssuperblog.blogspot.com/2006/10/something-wicked-is-great-achievement_26.html
https://markssuperblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/something-wicked-this-way-comes-but-fun.html
https://markssuperblog.blogspot.com/2008/10/its-most-wonderful-time-of-year.html
https://markssuperblog.blogspot.com/2019/08/its-astounding-piece-of-americana.html
https://markssuperblog.blogspot.com/2019/08/celebrating-big-show-part-4.html
https://markssuperblog.blogspot.com/2010/10/something-wicked-this-way-comes.html
https://markssuperblog.blogspot.com/2006/10/secret-origin-of-something-wicked-this.html(Can you tell I love that book?)
Back to the sainted Mary Lou the bookworm ...
One of the mostest bittersweet things you can imagine was going through her books when she left them behind. Some I donated, some I sold and then donated the money, and some I kept.
Mom bought the book in 1994, according to her bookplate. But see? see? SEE?
Goes to show you, great bookworms think alike!
Monday, November 23, 2020
Book Review: "The First Star Trek Movie: Bringing the Franchise to the Big Screen, 1969-1980" -- by Sherilyn Connelly
Connelly does a first-rate job of presenting the fruits
of her research. She sifted through tons
of newspaper articles and other media.
She did a lot of work at the Margaret
Herrick Library.
That’s good. What
just about ruined the book for me was Connelly’s authorly
intrusions. I came across one online
mention of this book as “scholarly.” Not
completely. In my English major’s opinion, “scholarly” does not include snark, much less
not-cute-but-trying-to-be plugs for another of the author’s works.
EXAMPLES of author intrusion ...
- · page 62, referring to the probably terrible Roddenberry film Pretty Maids All in a Row: “like most Vadim films it was rather vile”
- · page 65 contains a seven-lines-long plug for a previous Connelly book evidently about My Little Pony fandom
- · another self-aggrandizement on page 87 takes up “only” three lines of text
- · page 92 contains a whole paragraph of how the intrusive author likes Susan Sackett for giving the intrusive author something to ramble on about, intrusively
- · page 131, “I again recommend my book ...”
- · page 160, another intrusion to plug it
- · page 171 – I submit that nobody cares when, or how often, the author saw Apocalypse Now
My problem is this stuff has no
place in a “scholarly” book. Connelly
did tons of research to make this short book a gold standard of reference about
the road to Star Trek: The Motion Picture. It really hurts my brain to trip over a
smelly pile of authorial self-plugging or an unhip “for reals” (inserted in a
comment about Nimoy) comment in the middle of otherwise right-on narrative
about my favorite franchise.
I would be remiss in my typical book-reviewing nitpickiness without pointing out some actual errors:
- · On pages 65, 66, 93, 124, and 199 (note 27) Connelly misspells the last name of Trek designer Matt Jefferies as “Jeffries.” What makes it really grating is that on page 130, she gets his name RIGHT!
- · On page 65 and frequently thereafter, she describes the Franz Joseph Star Trek Blueprints as “fanon”—that is, add-on fannish inventions which are taken as authorized by other fans, but aren’t really “official.” What’s wrong about that statement? The drawings by Franz Joseph Schnaubelt began as “fan canon”—until Schnaubelt mailed them to Roddenberry. The Great Bird of the Galaxy went ga-ga, and in 1973 the “Franz Joseph” drawings were published by Ballantine and licensed by Paramount. That MAKES THEM OFFICIAL. You can read about this here: http://www.trekplace.com/fj-fjnewittint01.html
- · Page 105 discusses an unfilmed story for “Star Trek Phase II” by Worley Thorne. The title is given as “Are Unheard Memories Sweet?” but the actual title for this creepy tale is “Are Unheard Melodies Sweet?”
- And don’t forget her wish to sell hot chocolate to bleary-eyed STTMP line-waiters, if she only had a time machine—but “the first I’d do would be to kill baby Hitler ...” (page 156). What the heck does either part of this comment have to do with otherwise fine reporting?
This is what I don’t get: Why would anybody dilute a really stunning
assembly of research by sticking in a bunch of sucky attempts at snark and/or
humor?
By the way, other people think that
the book (and Connelly’s writing style) are simply marvy—Psychobabble, for one.
http://psychobabble200.blogspot.com/2019/10/review-first-star-trek-movie-bringing.html
Thursday, November 19, 2020
Superman and JFK
Monday, November 16, 2020
Super Clothes #7: Sears Has Everything! (except stores)
This long-sleeved flannel-type boy’s outfit is size 10. In a stunning piece of allegorical art, Superman appears to be flying out of an upside-down ice-cream cone in outer space. And he’s carrying a tumbleweed which is on fire!
This boffo robe has all your favorites! That’s assuming your favorites are Superman, Captain Marvel, or Batman, of course.
This more understated robe is labeled size 12-14. But, as modeled by six-year-old Araya Sunshine, that sizing is probably not accurate.
Well, that’s all the sartorial super-splendor for now, friends! See you next time!
Thursday, November 12, 2020
I'm a Marxist, Number 2!
The book mentioned above, The Marx Bros Scrapbook, is indeed filled with irrepressible reminiscences from Groucho, in the form of long-term quotations/interviews with Richard J Anobile. Let the SOBs fall where they may, I say!
Monday, November 09, 2020
Lois Lane, the First Lady of Comics!
Now dig up the issues mentioned from your bac-issue boxes and reread them! See you on Thursday!
copyright © by Mark Alfred