I don't know who's to blame, but the quality of on-the-fly proofing for Channel 9 in OKC has slipped precipitately in the past few y...

Yep, that's the first post of this year's APRIL FOOLISHNESS. And a poke at my own high-falutin' self. Because it turns out I wa...

This review is from the June 30, 1984 Oklahoma City Journal . With this we draw to a close another installment of TREKKING WITH CLIPPINGS.  ...

Yup, these three clippings all concern the second sequel.  This one, from the September 24, 1982 OKC Times , doesn't count because it...

All three of these articles came out in relation to STTMP . This is from the November 31, 1979 OKC  Journal .  Note in the middle of the cen...

Sometimes you just know the editors of these scandal rags were laughing themselves sick over their self-perceived cleverness! Like this sele...

That's one of the stereotypical movie-star laments.  In the case of Trekdom, we've been fortunate that people who want to do it have...

Our joy at getting a Star Trek movie was separate from any opinions about what we got. And we wanted MORE! This clipping from the Oklahoman...

This article is from the August 14, 1982 TV Guide . Dig that crazy headband!  See you on Monday, fellow Trekkians.   

Yep, this month of March will feature more of the hundreds of newspaper and magazine articles I clipped from the 1960s into the 1990s. The a...

Yes, this is the final post for this year's MY SIXTIES VALENTINE. Don't miss the word "So" under the boy barber's chin...

Here's the as-yet-unshared valentines I received in 1962 for Valentine's Day, in Mrs Pickell's kindergarten class.  But first th...

You know, childhood in the Sixties had a lot more innocence for us than I imagine is the case nowadays. I mean, we all know what bunnies do ...

Yup, these valentines from 1963 feature motivation of some kind. It's interesting that a lot of Valentines seem to be emulating the live...